Final Whistleblower "Collected Proceeds" Regulations Issued
Today the Treasury Department issued the finalized Treas. Reg. Section 301.7623-1(a) and (g) relating to the definition of “collected proceeds” for purposes of section 7623 tax whistleblower awards. Although the language of the final whistleblower regulation was unchanged from the proposed regulation, the supplementary information to the final regulation reveals that the Treasury Department shares our view that section 7623's definition of "collected proceeds” should be read broadly. Treasury affirmatively responded to our hearing testimony with respect to the question of whether restitution payments are award eligible and whether the reduction of a tax attribute in one year can result in an award from proceeds collected in another year. The unchanged final regulation confirmed that awards can be paid on information that that leads to the “denial of a claim for refund that otherwise would have been paid” - which is a huge victory for whistleblowers because the IRS initially sought to make these amounts ineligible for awards.

Comments (2)
Read through and enter the discussion by using the form at the endLinda Williams - February 22, 2012 8:14 AM
Criminal fines and penalties to remain outside the definition of "collected proceeds" contrary to the wording of the (1) 2006 legislation, (2) intention of Congress and (3) IRS practice of making awards prior to 2006 legislation.
Looks like the public consultation process held by the IRS by way of written views followed by a meeting in Washington on the 19 May 2011, was purely cosmetic to placate the Senate Finance Committee, in particular Senator Grassley.
......................and it took a 1 year for the IRS to respond!!!
Scott A. Knott - February 22, 2012 11:33 AM
The 2011 hearing on this reg was held as part of the public "notice and comment" period that is required for all Treasury Regulations. We correctly predicted at the time the proposed reg had come out that IRS Chief Counsel had already made up their mind that criminal fines were not going to be included in their award determinations, and that a whistleblower denied an award on that basis would need to sue them to get the rule changed. Erica wrote some great articles on this topic but I think that the only person who can change their mind is a judge.